Forum Topics

Sarah Trimmer  and Private Eye

Wonderful piece in Nooks and Corners column of the new edition of 'Private Eye' regarding the destruction of Sarah Trimmer's school founded in 1786.The narrative is that Hounslow council refused repeated applications to demolish the adjoining chapel and also an application to convert the school into flats was way back in 2001. In February last year an application for partial demolition to turn the school into 3 residential units was again turned down.Then in May 2016 IDM - the developers - without warning or authorisation or listed building consent, removed the roof and demolished the chimneys, claiming that the former was overloaded and the latter unsafe. Enforcement demanded that what was left of the school be covered and protected, which was done. IDM then started sand blasting the now cracked walls, until a temporary stop order was imposed. "In February, incomprehensibly, Hounslow granted listed building consent for rebuilding the roof and rear and side walls, although in May it refused permission for conversion into 3 bungalow flats. The council's own report on this confirms that the school 'is an important 18th century building, considered to be of national importance, and its special appearance and interest must be retained. So 'it is considered that this proposal does not adequately value the architectural integrity of the listed building, and that the proposed works would fail to preserve its special interest and setting'.But what is the council going to do to enforce the law and make IDM behave?"The article then mentions the Westminster case of the pub that was demolished, and Westminster insisting that the developer rebuild it before the site could be sold."Surely feeble Hounslow could and should do the same, for all that remains today of Mrs. Trimmer's charitable legacy are the remains of the west and south walls."The article then poses the question that as with Westminster when the Eye highlighted it, "would the council use its powers to punish offenders and make sure they make no money from the cleared site. A hefty fine? Why not a prison sentence? Why not indeed? By its actions IDM West London has scarcely shown itself to be a deserving members of society".Don't hold your breath if you expect Hounslow to find their backbone.

Vanessa Smith ● 3335d39 Comments ● 3319d

Guy Lambert's blog

GuyCongratulations on lasting for one year. I've dabbled with the odd blog and realise how hard it can be.I'm still not convinced that getting youngsters to invest into a credit union that makes no contractual promise as to its rate of interest payable is prudent advice. Returning to your blog this week you say'Tuesday morning our occasional meeting of the working group on the transfer of planned maintenance (of council housing) to Lampton 360 Facilities Management. This took place in April as planned and is going OK operationally, however the person who was leading for Lampton has left which means that our poor old director of Housing, who is not exactly underworked what with the aftermath of Grenfell Tower as well as everything else, now has to help Lampton go find a new director whilst overseeing the day-to-day running.'As you know it's quite remarkable that the existence of the groups you mention and their membership is unknown to me a fellow councillor and the public at large.I have no idea that a director of Lampton FM has left the reasons why or even his salary. Perhaps you'll update us?Can we also see the minutes of these meetings. Given the current uncontrolled costs of our Lampton waste operation, its inability to provide KPIs a new £22m recycling centre and now an as yet unfunded obligation of circa £6-7m to reinstate the Spaceway Waste Centre  its time to come clean on what's happening.Cosy little labour groups  with big egos and little experience are wrecking LBH finances.Cabinet members consistently show in my view how little they know about their brief. You must surely agreeJohn

John Todd ● 3333d18 Comments ● 3323d