Forum Topics

Information

Requesting Hounslow Councillor's case figures for municipal year of 2019/2020.  Please detail by ward and councillors. The information listed below shows casework numbers as recorded on our systems.  Councillors receive and act on many other issues which aren't recorded on our own systems either because they take them up direct with officers by phone, email, and in meetings, or help the resident/business solve them without the need for additional council intervention, or because they are outside council responsibilities.  Those outside council responsibilities might be issues raised with police, TfL, business owners or be about, for example, parks not owned/managed by the council.  In addition, responding to queries about planning applications is not recorded as casework.   CouncillorVolumesWardCouncillor Aqsa Ahmed34Feltham NorthCouncillor Javed Akhunzada63BedfontCouncillor Candice Atterton15HanworthCouncillor Harleen Atwal Hear48Heston CentralCouncillor Patrick Barr63Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Lily Bath70Heston WestCouncillor Joanna Biddolph249Turnham GreenCouncillor Tom Bruce301Hounslow SouthCouncillor Samia Chaudhary80HanworthCouncillor Komal Chaudri58Feltham NorthCouncillor Unsa Chaudri64Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Bandna Chopra65Hounslow WestCouncillor Mel Collins119BrentfordCouncillor Steve Curran636SyonCouncilor Theo Dennison13SyonCouncillor Michael Denniss6Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Sukhbir Singh Dhaliwal42CranfordCouncillor Poonam Dhillon1CranfordCouncillor Katherine Dunne60SyonCouncillor Richard Eason174Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Richard Foote41HanworthCouncillor Adriana Gheorghe225BedfontCouncillor Gabriella Giles28Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Ranjit Gill158Turnham GreenCouncillor Ajmer Grewal90Hounslow CentralCouncillor Pritam Grewal163Hounslow CentralCouncillor Puneet Grewal10Hanworth ParkCouncillor Shivraj Grewal53Heston CentralCouncillor Vickram Grewal78Hounslow HeathCouncillor Bishnu Bahadur Gurung90Hanworth ParkCouncillor Sam Hearn157Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Kamaljit Kaur0Heston EastCouncillor Hanif Khan75Hanworth ParkCouncillor Hina Kiani1Hounslow HeathCouncillor Afzaal Kiani28Hounslow HeathCouncillor Gurmail Lal43Heston EastCouncillor Guy Lambert338BrentfordCouncillor Tony Louki685Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Khulique Malik135CranfordCouncillor Nisar Malik13Hounslow CentralCouncillor Amritpal Mann33Heston EastCouncillor Gerald McGregor48Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Shaida Mehrban66Hounslow SouthCouncillor Hina Mir8Feltham WestCouncillor Alan Mitchell61Feltham WestCouncillor Ron Mushiso86Turnham GreenCouncillor Surinder Purewal40Heston CentralCouncllor Shantanu Rajawat49Heston WestCouncillor Daanish Saeed47IsleworthCouncillor Sue Sampson80IsleworthCouncillor Balraj Sarai*0Heston WestCouncillor Salman Shaheen105IsleworthCouncillor Jagdish Sharma2Hounslow WestCouncillor Raghwinder Siddhu191BedfontCouncillor Corinna Smart29BrentfordCouncillor Karen Smith795Hounslow SouthCouncillor Sohan Sumra28Hounslow WestCouncillor Kuldeep Tak*16Feltham NorthCouncillor John Todd399Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Mohammed Umair30Feltham West

Vanessa Smith ● 2229d2 Comments ● 2229d

The truth re Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

It is important for people to know the truth, not CIC propaganda, so here is a rebuttal of some points in Cllr Lambert's statement re the club:'the bowls club has been wound up by the members/committee' - trying to make it sound as if it was our decision; in fact it was forced upon us by the CIC who ordered us to be out by Jan 2020'it had 22 members of whom 12 were active' - there was in fact a petition signed by 21 playing members who wanted the club to be allowed to continue'They maintained the green themselves with some help from Capel Manor' - the vast majority of the work was carried out by the members; there was occasionally some help from Capel Manor students who in exchange benefited from learning greenkeeping skills'the lease called for them to maintain the clubhouse, however the CIC stepped in to do so at times at a cost of around £2 per annum' - three longstanding members say they have no idea where this claim came from; there was no regular contribution from the CIC; in fact no one can remember any contribution except something to do with some fire alarm/equipment'they believed membership would grow after the delayed sports hub was completed but the development is many months late' - CIC should have kept a proper check on working practices and the (lack of) progress. The delays were not our fault, so couldn't the CIC have waited a few months longer to give us a chance to grow the membership?'Most of the bowlers have moved on to other clubs or retired' - not because we wanted to, but forced to retire in the case of those of us without cars who want to respect the instruction not to travel on public transport unnecessarily'It's not clear there would be anyone to fix the green' - a number of volunteers have offered to do so. Before the club was kicked out Capel Manor offered to take over the green maintenance provided the club was allowed to remain there. The CIC wouldn't even consider it.'The CIC is supposed to grow the use of the park' - how does killing off one of its longest-established activities contribute to that? Why could no other place in the park be considered for the pitch and putt so both activities could have co-existed?'pitch and putt mooted to attract 3000 players per year' - apart from the wildly optimistic numbers, if golf is so important to the park, why was the previous pitch and putt eliminated rather than relocated?

Bela Cunha ● 2237d24 Comments ● 2230d

Network Management Duty Guidance

Network management duty guidanceThis guidance is additional statutory guidance issued by the Secretary of State for Transport under Section 18 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 (“the act”).It applies to all highway authorities in England, who shall have regard to this guidance to deliver their network management duty under the act. It is effective from the date of publication.It does not replace the original Network Management Duty Guidance published in November 2004, but provides additional advice on techniques for managing roads to deal with COVID-19 response related issues. It will be reviewed 3 months after publication.The guidance sets out high-level principles to help local authorities to manage their roads and what actions they should take. Updates to this document or further guidance on related subjects may be published as the need is identified.Reallocating road space: measuresLocal authorities in areas with high levels of public transport use should take measures to reallocate road space to people walking and cycling, both to encourage active travel and to enable social distancing during restart (social distancing in this context primarily refers to the need for people to stay 2 metres apart where possible when outdoors). Local authorities where public transport use is low should be considering all possible measures.Measures should be taken as swiftly as possible, and in any event within weeks, given the urgent need to change travel habits before the restart takes full effect.None of these measures are new – they are interventions that are a standard part of the traffic management toolkit, but a step-change in their roll-out is needed to ensure a green restart. They include:Installing ‘pop-up’ cycle facilities with a minimum level of physical separation from volume traffic; for example, mandatory cycle lanes, using light segregation features such as flexible plastic wands; or quickly converting traffic lanes into temporary cycle lanes (suspending parking bays where necessary); widening existing cycle lanes to enable cyclists to maintain distancing. Facilities should be segregated as far as possible, i.e. with physical measures separating cyclists and other traffic. Lanes indicated by road markings only are very unlikely to be sufficient to deliver the level of change needed, especially in the longer term.Using cones and barriers: to widen footways along lengths of road, particularly outside shops and transport hubs; to provide more space at bus stops to allow people to queue and socially distance; to widen pedestrian refuges and crossings (both formal and informal) to enable people to cross roads safely and at a distance.Encouraging walking and cycling to school, for example through the introduction of more ‘school streets’. Pioneered in London, these are areas around schools where motor traffic is restricted at pick-up and drop-off times, during term-time. They can be effective in encouraging more walking and cycling, particularly where good facilities exist on routes to the school and where the parents, children and school are involved as part of the scheme development.Reducing speed limits: 20mph speed limits are being more widely adopted as an appropriate speed limit for residential roads, and many through streets in built-up areas. 20mph limits alone will not be sufficient to meet the needs of active travel, but in association with other measures, reducing the speed limit can provide a more attractive and safer environment for walking and cycling.Introducing pedestrian and cycle zones: restricting access for motor vehicles at certain times (or at all times) to specific streets, or networks of streets, particularly town centres and high streets. This will enable active travel but also social distancing in places where people are likely to gather.Modal filters (also known as filtered permeability); closing roads to motor traffic, for example by using planters or large barriers. Often used in residential areas, this can create neighbourhoods that are low-traffic or traffic free, creating a more pleasant environment that encourages people to walk and cycle, and improving safety.Providing additional cycle parking facilities at key locations, such as outside stations and in high streets, to accommodate an increase in cycling, for example by repurposing parking bays to accommodate cycle racks.Changes to junction design to accommodate more cyclists – for example, extending Advanced Stop Lines at traffic lights to the maximum permitted depth of 7.5 metres where possible.‘Whole-route’ approaches to create corridors for buses, cycles and access only on key routes into town and city centres.Identifying and bringing forward permanent schemes already planned, for example under Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans, and that can be constructed relatively quickly.Other considerationsAll these measures can be introduced temporarily, either in isolation or as a combined package of measures. Some interventions, including new lightly-segregated cycle lanes, will not require Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). Others will require TROs, of which there are different types. The main ones are:Permanent: this process includes prior consultation on the proposed scheme design, a 21-day notice period for statutory consultees and others who can log objections; there can be a public inquiry in some circumstances.Experimental: these are used to trial schemes that may then be made permanent. Authorities may put in place monitoring arrangements, and carry out ongoing consultation once the measure is built. Although the initial implementation period can be quick, the need for extra monitoring and consultation afterwards makes them a more onerous process overall.Temporary: these can be in place for up to 18 months. There is a 7-day notice period prior to making the TRO and a 14-day notification requirement after it is made, plus publicity requirements. These are most suitable for putting in place temporary measures and road closures.Emergency legislation came into force on 23 May 2020 to amend, temporarily, the:The Road Traffic (Temporary Restrictions) Procedure Regulations 1992The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996The Secretary of State’s Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1990The amendments speed up making emergency Traffic Orders that may be needed to, for example, widen pavements or install cycle lanes. The main change is to the means of advertising the order, which can be via digital means. A second order still needs to be published for information 14 days later in a newspaper, where these are available, or via digital media.The amendments also allow, for non-emergency Orders, alternative publicity arrangements to help deal with some practical difficulties that have arisen as a result of restrictions that are in place. For example, these might be where local newspapers have closed or have moved publications on-line or local authority offices are closed to the public, and there are concerns about the safety of staff posting site notices in some circumstances. The amendments will cease to have effect as of 30 April 2021.Traffic signs may be needed to inform pedestrians, cyclists and drivers of changes to road layouts, particularly where temporary widening is in place. Advice on using existing signing, and some new temporary designs, will be published alongside this guidance. These are covered by the provisions of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 and as such do not need special signs authorisation from the department.Authorities should monitor and evaluate any temporary measures they install, with a view to making them permanent, and embedding a long-term shift to active travel as we move from restart to recovery.Access will still be required for other activities in the road, particularly street works, maintenance and other highway works, which will need to be balanced with work to reallocate road space to active travel. Street works and maintenance activity should carry on, as they will be essential to getting the economy going again. Use of the Street Manager digital service will help to plan and co-ordinate works.Depending on the measures they are installing, authorities will also need to consider access for Blue Badge holders, deliveries and other essential services as appropriate.Authorities should seek input from stakeholders during the design phase. They should consult with the local chiefs of police and emergency services to ensure access is maintained where needed, for example to roads that are closed to motor traffic. Local businesses, including those temporarily closed, should be consulted to ensure proposals meet their needs when they re-open. Kerbside access should be enabled wherever possible for deliveries and servicing.The public sector equality duty still applies, and in making any changes to their road networks, authorities must consider the needs of disabled people and those with other protected characteristics. Accessibility requirements apply to temporary measures as they do to permanent ones.

Bernard Allen ● 2246d0 Comments ● 2246d