Forum Topics

Another loaded consultation, another 'done' deal

Having just taken a look at the 'consultation' on Parking Charges for Gunnersbury park, the level of loaded questions is a disgrace.They are comparing themselves with National Trust and Heritage England venues seemingly deluded that they are as important and attractive as those locations.It is OUR local park, bequeathed in covenant and trust to the people of Ealing, Acton and Brentford.It is funded one way or another through our taxes and yes, for far too long, it has been badly neglected by the ineptness of governance by it's custodians.But what have we now?  Buildings, new facilities, Yes. But way overdue, by a generation.But now, also not terribly affordable to the local populous.I usually cycle there. Take the car if  carting older or younger people or meeting friends and going on somewhere.Still, the the important fundamentals, like the  pathways are still awful making it poor for elderly walkers and toddlers and cyclists.Nor is the park easy to access for a quick visit.But to charge for the car park and justify it by comparing to venues that are not the same and not asking indeed, whether the charges are acceptable in any mode.There is even an inference that disabled badge holders will also be charged.No local residents of either borough over 60 should be charged at all.The car parks is almost deserted during the week. A hourly charge will hit the sports players as most games are 90 mins plus preparation and changing times so thats 2-3 hours.So where is the consultation question off whether to charge at weekends or when events are held?Maybe the cost of this form of managing this park in such a way is to high to be justified.Screwing the local people who support it on top of what all of us pay for whether we use it or not is completely wrong.It is a Public Open space free to use. Parking is part of that.  If it were stuffed full of vehicles 7 days a week and only 4 people in the place then maybe a different matter but it is not.As with Osterley Park which is now near deserted during the week, it now relies on corporate events to keep it's facilities alive. But local people especially the elderly are staying way as these charges left right and centre are not affordable.This is just like a TfL consultation.  Pointless as it is clearly already a done deal with everything in place.Shameful and contemptuous to all local residents of both Boroughs

Raymond Havelock ● 2534d4 Comments ● 2530d

There's none so blind.

There are times when some of our local councillors really do take your breath away. Take for instance the gem in Cllr. Lambert's weekly blog we have been treated to this week in respect of the planning application for The George Inn a Grade 2 listed building and former pub in Isleworth.The very real concerns of local residents dismissed in a couple of throw-away sentences:"Thursday evening was the Planning Committee. It was a packed hall, mainly with supporters of the proposal to turn the listed and unoccupied George pub in Isleworth into what some describe as an Islamic prayer centre and others describe as a mosque. We had had a bit of a preview of this proposal at an area forum meeting last year and I formed a favourable impression. Not much had changed in the meantime. Some locals are worried about traffic and parking impacts but the committee found it hard to see this as a decisive problem. The very urbane local Isleworth councillor Salman Shaheen suggested some conditions to the approval which everybody was happy with, but then we got into an absurd procedural wrangle which caused steam to emit from the ears of one dishonourable member (this one) as we wasted 15 minutes arguing about nothing. Anyway, approved."Leaving aside the 'procedural wrangle' which served to remind us that some people need to do some more homework on committee and planning issues, the detailed objection letter sent to ALL committee members setting out the local amenity society's and a local resident's association was reduced in the officer's report to five sentences.Now we have one of those committee members publicly patronising those same groups, as if we were a bunch of old dears with nothing else to do but have a whinge. As one correspondent e-mailed to me this morning - "he has completely undermined the concerns of local people as if they count for sod all. What chance do we have with pompous gits like him making decisions that will cause so many problems to residents?"Cllr. Lambert we need hardly remind locals around here was one of those same members who voted for the closure of Church St. which in no small way has added to the already congested local roads, and it is a decision that, two years down the line, still reverberates in Isleworth. This latest short-sighted decision will cause even more congestion, pollution and aggravation - but no matter - people who do not live here (apart from one) and care even less about something that will not affect them in the least go on their merry way without a thought for anyone. One day these 'representatives' might learn to listen - or at least try visiting an area before they come to any decision which clearly (apart from one who sees it on a daily basis) they hadn't. All Cllr. Lambert does is add insult to injury - but then we are usually referred to as 'the usual  suspects' - says it all really.

Vanessa Smith ● 2555d7 Comments ● 2534d

Ground Penetrating Radar Scan.

I am a True Crime Writer and Television Investigative Consultant. I have for the past 14 years been researching the horrendous crimes committed by Abertillery-born Harold Jones. In 1921, Jones then aged 15 murdered 2 Abertillery, Wales schoolgirls, Freda Burnell aged 8 and 11 year-old Florence Little. After being released from prison in 1941 Jones served 5 years in the army before settling in Fulham, Putney and finally Hammersmith where he died in 1971. Jones used a number of names during his time in London - first Harold Jones, then Harry Stevens and finally Harry Jones. Research has led myself and many criminal experts to believe that Jones went on to become the serial killer known as the Hammersmith Nudes' Killer (1959-1965.) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/488557/is-this-man-the-real-jack-the-stripper/These 8 unsolved killings have over the past 11 years been given much media attention. In 2011 a one hour drama documentary titled Fred Dinenage Murder Casebook - Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer has been shown repeatedly on various satellite Channels worldwide. (Google Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer.) This led to a major 90 minute national television documentary which was shown in January and February 2019. (Google Dark Son - The Hunt For A Serial Killer to see trailers.) In the early 1960's Jones using the name Harry Stevens  had lived in Fulham, 2 streets away from 3rd nudes's victim Hannah Tailford. In 1964 and 1965 whilst living in Putney under the name Harry Stevens, he was AT THE SAME TIME occupying a rented house in Hammersmith using the name Harry Jones. This was 2 streets away from 7th nudes victim Frances Brown and 8th nudes' victim Bridget O'Hara. It is my belief that there may be trophies buried in the garden at Hammersmith and the owner has now given me permission to use ground-penetrating radar to detect any such evidence.I am trying to locate someone in the film or media industry or anyone else who would be willing to cover the cost of the scan and record the garden being scanned. (Approximately 70 square metres.)On top of the circumstantial evidence regarding Jones living just 2 streets away from 3 of the murder victims below are a few more startling links.(1) Jones' own daughter has indicated that her father would leave her and her mother at home at the times of the killings and book into Rowton House, a doss house in Hammersmith whenever her parents would have a row. The daughter stated that she now believes her father would do this in fear that he may kill his wife in temper. Jones' own son-in-law stated that "There's no smoke without fire is there?"(2) Bridget O'Hara, the 8th victim was last seen leaving a pub near Rowton House on 11 January 1975 - Jones' birthday.(3) The person believed to be the killer had in 1964 shown one woman (a prostitute) a Metropolitan Police warrant card after she had got into his car. She stated that she felt very uncomfortable and made an excuse to get out of the vehicle. The driver gave her some cash before she got out. I believe the person was Harold Jones who was using the warrant card that had belonged to John Widdows, Jones father-in-law who had died just 2-3 years earlier. Widdows was a former London Metropolitan Police officer. Jones daughter stated that she still possessed her grandfather's retirement clock and Widdows may have possibly kept his warrant card when he retired.(4) At least 4 of the 8 murder victims were stored in a disused electricity sub-station on the Heron Trading Estate in East Acton. This was about 4 miles from Jones' rented property in Hammersmith. Jones daughter claims that her father worked in ACTON at the time of the murders but couldn't or wouldn't reveal which business premises he had worked at.(5) Jones left prison in 1941 after refusing treatment or discussing his crimes with the relevant authorities. The prison authorities noted that Jones, right to the day he was released showed no remorse for his crimes in Wales. Just shortly before his release the prison governor stated: "Sad as it seems, I can see no hopeful prospects for Jones in the future." The prison chaplain described Jones as "a no hoper." And then Jones was released onto an unsuspecting public possibly in the hope he would get killed in Libya where he served 5 years in the army.I am in contact with relatives of 6 of the 8 murder victims and they all (especially adult children of these women) are keen to know the identity of the killer in their lifetime. I am now 67 years old and I would like to know for sure the killer's identify in my lifetime.If anyone would like to come on board with this matter or have any practical suggestions I can be contacted at n.milkin@sky.com or 07989555376. Regards. Neil Milkins.

Neil Milkins ● 2538d3 Comments ● 2536d

PCNs in Enfield Road, Brentford

Over the last few weeks PCNs have been issued to drivers who park outside the controlled hours on the single yellow line which runs from 26 Enfield Rd down towards Eastbourne Rd.  They are being issued because people are, of necessity, parking with 2 wheels on the kerb.It's obvious that if we don't park with 2 wheels on the kerb (in the same way as cars in the marked bays) we risk getting our cars damaged and/or completely blocking the road. The road is just not wide enough to park safely with all 4 wheels on the carriageway. When the CPZ was first implemented (about 6 years ago) I recall having a conversation with the man from the Council who was in charge of organising it all and was assured that kerb parking would be permitted on the single yellow outside the controlled hours.It is only very recently that tickets have been issued. I received a ticket at 8.30pm but most of them seem to have been issued between 11pm and midnight. 5 were issued at about 11.30pm the night before last. People who come home late and can't find anywhere else to park are particularly affected - some might say "targeted".I've raised the issue with Cllr Lambert who is sympathetic but has apparently been unable to get any response from the traffic team.  The bottom line is that if we can't park with 2 wheels on the kerb then we can't park at all and lose parking space for approximately 8 - 10 cars.  If the reality is that we cannot park at all in that location then the signage should make that clear.Could those who've been affected and those who don't want to lose this parking space lobby our Councillors to express their view?  I'm appealing my ticket and am quite prepared to take it to the Adjudicator if necessary.

Alison Robins ● 2540d12 Comments ● 2538d