Forum Topics

Isleworth stabbed in the back once again, the night democracy died.

Well didn't our councillors do us proud tonight over the Church Street decision? After a lot of speakers for and against the closure, councillors had their say. Theo Dennison concluded the data from the consultant and traffic department was 'inconclusive', but, the majority in favour of re-opening were 'guilty' of ruining Church St. by driving through it. Katherine Dunne almost sent the assembled locals to sleep with her ramble about how she likes cycling and on and on. Peter Carey was the only person who mentioned the fact that the vast majority (over 70%) of those who responded to the consultation wanted the road opened, and he had heard nothing to persuade him that that should not be upheld. The Dear Leader told the - by now weary - audience that in spite of what we may think they do have make hard decisions and they are not based on whether or not the electorate were in favour. (It had been pointed out earlier that the 700 odd people who wanted the road re-opened were half of some of the councillor's votes at the last election). According to him they are not swayed by their popularity (or not), if he really thinks that he's in the wrong game, politics is all about winning if you don't win you can't put your policies into play. There is always a political dimension, which clearly has passed this bunch by.Chief backstabber was Cllr. Mayne who moved the recommendation of officers, he rides a bike, he walks, he drives a train, and he obviously doesn't give a stuff for anyone who hasn't the physical wherewithal to do as he does. Thanks should go to Tony Louki who at least brought to officer's attention that there are three new schools going to be built locally two of which have no public transport links for children from this end of Isleworth, so will be transported by - car! And one another free school which will have children from all over, again probably coming in cars, thus adding to the horrendous conditions on Twickenham Rd. Sheila O'Reilly and Peter Carey also voted against the motion. Cllr. Sampson voted for and Cllr. Green abstained.  For sheer pomposity it would be hard to beat Cllr. Collins, enough to make you scream, what no-one mentioned at all was that in a democracy the will of the majority must prevail. Roll on May 2018.

Vanessa Smith ● 3461d44 Comments ● 3437d

New Secondary School for Brentford/Isleworth/Osterley

The submission for a new non-denominational, mixed, secondary school for 1150 children serving Brentford and Isleworth has been received by the Council.The school would be called the Bolder Academy and the proposed site is along MacFarlane Lane in Osterley (near the Tesco supermarket just off Gillette Corner).The proposed school is part of a larger plan for two schools and site swapping involving the Grasshoppers Rugby Club the site of which is to be vacated for the Bolder Academy. The proposal is that the Rugby Club will move to the northern half of the old White Lodge sports site along Syon Lane. The southern half of the old sports field is now taken up by the Nishkam all-through school (primary and secondary) for 1400 children which is currently under construction.To facilitate the Rugby Club move the Council is raising over £9 million to develop the northern half of the site and has also agreed to waive two years of rent arrears owed to the Council. £6 million will be in the form of a direct grant and the remaining money will be raised by selling SKY some of the council-owned Metropolitan Open Land adjacent to the proposed school site.A residents' campaign in Osterley fought a hard battle against building the Nishkam school on Metropolitan Open Land which had long been used for sports purposes. Despite overwhelming local opposition the Council's Planning Committee approved the submission at its meeting on 3rd December 2015.The main concern of the Osterley & Wyke Green Residents' Association (OWGRA) about the Bolder submission is that, even though problems of access to the school have been raised repeatedly, no satisfactory solution has been offered. Syon Lane is already highly congested and is in an area of very poor public transport (PTAL 0). As matters stand almost 3000 children and staff for both Nishkam and Bolder would all have to access the schools through Syon Lane. OWGRA has warned that this is both dangerous, unhealthy and will worsen already very congested traffic conditions and considerably increase levels of pollution.All the current information on the application is available through the OWGRA website: https://owgra.org.uk/the-bolder-academy/

David Pavett ● 3437d1 Comments ● 3437d

Passing the buck

Dealing with Hounslow Council is a pretty soul destroying experience most of the time and I think it's getting worse. It seems whoever you contact for whatever reason spends more time trying to duck out of dealing with you and your complaint than trying to resolve it. It is high time that people were reminded that the council is there to serve the needs of local people not to create an obstruction at every turn.I contacted the housing department regarding a rear access road that runs at the rear of the road where we live, this road  and it's upkeep is, and always has been, the council housing department's responsibility. However, we always have to start a mini campaign to get them to come and do a bit of a clear-up and tidy once or twice a year. The rest of the time most people who use the road to access their garages do their bit and keep it in a reasonable state.The road does get a bit overgrown at this time of year and the end nearest the entrance does attract some small scale rubbish dumping, an old for sale sign, plastic bags of various unwanted items and so on. First of all I get a reply from the 'area manager'  - who knew there was one? Can we talk about this - after I'd already sent a detailed e-mail - what's to chat about? I replied to say that there wasn't any issue apart from the fact that housing fail to maintain this area inline with the agreement we got when we purchased our house, so could they please just have a shufty and get it tidied? Now I get a reply saying they do do this three times a year!! Not in the forty years we've lived here they haven't and - sending me photos of the road I've told them about! Are these people for real? Now they claim they don't touch overgrowth  - which they have in the past - and the householders whose responsibility it is will have to cut it - not unreasonable. I have asked if they now intend to write to these households to tell them to get weaving in accordance with their 'management' of the area.I think most people are happy to keep the area where they live clean and tidy but what are we supposed to do with old for sale signs etc.? In the time that taking photos and e-mailing has taken the clear up could have been done. A couple of years ago this department suddenly took in into their heads to foist on us a gallows gate at the entrance to this access at a cost of several thousand pounds, no-one wanted this or asked for it, and there it has been- locked back and never used - but an occasional clear-up? God forbid. Let's tell the punters a hundred and one reasons why we shouldn't do something rather than remember why we are here - it's called providing a service that we agreed to.

Vanessa Smith ● 3446d0 Comments ● 3446d